Comparison of Delivery of Care Before and During COVID-19 Within an Academic Outpatient Psychiatry Practice.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged outpatient mental health clinics. This article compares care delivery and patient characteristics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in outpatient mental health clinics within an academic health system. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients who received outpatient psychiatric services at two clinics (A and B). The investigators compared care delivery with patients with mental health conditions prepandemic (January 1-December 31, 2019) and midpandemic (January 1-December 31, 2020) periods. Care delivery was defined as the number and type of new and return visits (telehealth and face-to-face visits), patients with recorded measurement-based care (MBC) outcomes, and communication capability between patients and providers. Results: During the prepandemic period, 6,984 patients were seen in Clinics A and B, resulting in 57,629 visits. In the midpandemic period, 7,110 patients were served, resulting in 61,766 total visits. Medication management visits increased from 2019 to 2020; number of visits with documented outcome measures increased by 90% in Clinic A and 15% in Clinic B. The number of MyChart messages per patient increased more than twofold during the midpandemic period. The number of new visits with primary diagnosis of anxiety disorders increased in CY2020 and the number of visits with primary diagnosis of major depressive/mood disorders decreased in CY2020. Payor mix did not vary between the two periods although there was variability between payor mix at the two primary clinic locations. Discussion: The study suggests that there was no detrimental impact on access to care between the prepandemic and midpandemic periods within the health system. Mental health visits while pivoting to telehealth increased during the midpandemic period. Transition to telepsychiatry improved the ability to administer and document MBC.

Changes in Perceived Stress of Pharmacy Students Pre- and Mid-COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine (1) the difference in perceived stress in first-year pharmacy students before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) the difference in perceived stress among pharmacy students working different numbers of hours. Methods: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), via an electronic survey, was administered throughout 2016-2021 using Qualtrics. End-of-year PSS scores were compared between the pre-pandemic group (2016-2018) and mid-pandemic group (2019-2021) using independent t-test and ANCOVA. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistic Version 28.0. Results: A total of 209 first-year pharmacy students participated (response rate of 88%). No significant difference in mean PSS score was detected in the mid-pandemic cohort when compared to pre-pandemic. The mean PSS score was greater in those who worked greater than 10 h weekly compared to those who worked less. Those who did not work had an even greater mean PSS score than those who worked. Conclusions: No significant difference was observed in perceived stress between the pre-pandemic and mid-pandemic cohorts, and an increased perceived stress score was observed in pharmacy students who did not work in comparison to students who worked 1-9 h and 10-29 h.

Perceptions of a virtual interview process for pharmacy residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multisite survey of residency candidates, preceptors, and residency program directors.

PURPOSE: To describe the perceptions of residency candidates, residency practitioners (current residents and preceptors), and residency program directors (RPDs) regarding a virtual interview process for pharmacy residency programs across multiple institutions. METHODS: In May 2021, an anonymous web-based questionnaire characterizing perceptions of the virtual interview process used during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was distributed to residency candidates, residency practitioners, and RPDs across 13 institutions. Quantitative responses measured on a 5-point Likert scale were summarized with descriptive statistics, and open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic qualitative methods. RESULTS: 236 residency candidates and 253 residency practitioners/RPDs completed the questionnaire, yielding response rates of 27.8% (236 of 848), and 38.1% (253 of 663), respectively. Overall, both groups perceived the virtual interview format positively. When asked whether virtual interviews should replace in-person interviews moving forward, 60.0% (18 of 30) of RPDs indicated they agreed or strongly agreed, whereas only 30.5% (61 of 200) of current preceptors/residents and 28.7% (66 of 230) of residency candidates agreed or strongly agreed. Thematic analysis of qualitative responses revealed that while virtual interviews were easier logistically, the lack of in-person interactions was a common concern for many stakeholders. Lastly, the majority (65.0%) of residency candidates reported greater than $1,000 in savings with virtual interviews. CONCLUSION: Virtual interviews offered logistical and financial benefits. The majority of RPDs were in favor of offering virtual interviews to replace in-person interviews, whereas the majority of residency candidates and practitioners preferred on-site interviews. As restrictions persist with the ongoing pandemic, our results provide insight into best practices for virtual pharmacy residency interviews.

The Nurse Leader's Role in Nurse Substance Use, Mental Health, and Suicide in a Peripandemic World.

Nurses are known to be at an increased risk of death by suicide, and recent studies have found links between nurse suicide, substance use, mental health issues, and job problems. Because of stigma, inaccessibility of resources, and regulatory and legal issues, nurses are unlikely to seek help unless a crisis forces them into treatment. The purpose of this article is to review the current understanding of nurse suicide, the psychological impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the strategic planning approach to identify the needs of nurses, and promising interventions and practices. Evidence-based strategies to intervene at the personal, institutional, and regulatory levels should be employed to reduce nurse suicide by focusing not only on suicide but also on treatment of substance and mental health issues, as well as a renewed focus on disciplinary procedures that may place nurses in immediate danger of death by suicide. Nurse leaders have a moral obligation to provide proactive, meaningful interventions to reduce the risk of death by suicide among nurses.